Marks v. Supreme Court of VA

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Marks v. Supreme Court of VA

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1605

BRENDA J. MARKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; CHRISTOPHER HUTTON, Commonwealth's Attorney City of Hampton; JAMES C. O'SHIELDS; HAMPTON GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, Eighth Judicial District; HONORABLE HENRY D. KASHOUTY; HONORABLE WILFORD TAYLOR, JR.; HON- ORABLE WILLIAM C. ANDREWS, III; HARRIETTE SPENCER, Clerk, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-71-4)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brenda J. Marks, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Robert Messitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

her

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marks v. Supreme Court of Virginia, No. CA-95-71-4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 26,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished