Mangus v. Chater, Comm
Mangus v. Chater, Comm
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1211
EMILY MANGUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-171-2)
Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996
Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emily Mangus, Appellant Pro Se. Charlotte Jefferson Hardnett, David Marcellus Frazier, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Phila- delphia, Pennsylvania; Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming
the Secretary's final decision denying her claim for disability
benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mangus v. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, No. CA-94-171-2 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished