U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Mahapatra v. Bradburn

Mahapatra v. Bradburn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 18, 1996

Mahapatra v. Bradburn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1718

SARADINDU MAHAPATRA; ALOK KUMAR, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus R. BRADBURN, Baltimore County Police; G.

DARRELL RUSSELL, Baltimore County District Court Judge, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96- 1168-L) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Saradindu Mahapatra, Alok Kumar, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order denying relief on their claims, which were brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) and the Geneva Convention on Human Rights. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and deny Appellants' motion for a jury trial. Mahapatra v. Bradburn, No. CA- 96-1168-L (D. Md. May 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.