Harris v. King

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Harris v. King

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1831

HERSCHELL L. HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUE KING,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-96-238)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herschell L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his employment discrimination action as frivolous under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act,

Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110

Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, Harris v.

King, No. CA-96-238 (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 1996), but modify the dis-

missal to be without prejudice.

28 U.S.C. § 2106

(1994). We deny

Appellant's motions for production of documents, expedited consid-

eration, and to amend the caption. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished