U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Bellamy v. Uniformed Ser Univ

Bellamy v. Uniformed Ser Univ
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 18, 1996

Bellamy v. Uniformed Ser Univ

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1468

FAITH D. BELLAMY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; WILLIAM PERRY; UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES, Medical School, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-3242-JFM, CA-95-1184-JFM, CA-95-2305-JFM)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Faith Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. George Levi Russell III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her motion for reconsideration, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), of the order dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bellamy v. Uniformed Servs. Univ. of the Health Sciences, Nos. CA-94-3242-JFM; CA-95-1184-JFM; CA-95-2305-JFM (D.

Md. Feb. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.