Joyce v. Pugh
Joyce v. Pugh
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6603
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALVAN P. PUGH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-95-132-2)
Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 25, 1996
Before HALL, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edwin Wayne Joyce, Appellant Pro Se. Alvan P. Pugh, GAVIN, COX, PUGH, GAVIN & GAVIN, Asheboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting his
motion to voluntarily dismiss his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) action,
but requiring that he pay the filing fee and be represented by an
attorney if he chooses to refile this action. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Joyce v. Pugh, No. CA-95-132-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished