Thompson v. Rentz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Thompson v. Rentz

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7284

GEORGE W. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. HUNTER RENTZ, Dr.; J. R. LAWSON, M.D.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-95-2458-18BE)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George W. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Rentz, No. CA- 95-2458-18BE (D.S.C. July 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished