U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Thompson v. Rentz

Thompson v. Rentz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 6, 1996

Thompson v. Rentz

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7284

GEORGE W. THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. HUNTER RENTZ, Dr.; J. R. LAWSON, M.D., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-95-2458-18BE)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George W. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Rentz, No. CA- 95-2458-18BE (D.S.C. July 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.