Overby v. Hester

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Overby v. Hester

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7199

FREDERICK L. OVERBY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CLAY HESTER, Sheriff, Newport News City Jail; MAJOR MOORE; CAPTAIN BOWER; LIEUTENANT HARRIS; LIEUTENANT WATERHOUSE; DOCTOR RUSSOTTO; DOCTOR ANDERSON; NURSE WILLIAMS,

Defendants - Appellees, and

CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS AND ITS COUNCIL; JANE DOE, Nurse,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-787-2)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick L. Overby, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint and denying his Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judg-

ment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason-

ing of the district court. Overby v. Hester, No. CA-94-787-2 (E.D.

Va. June 10, 1996 & July 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished