Overby v. Hester
Overby v. Hester
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7199
FREDERICK L. OVERBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CLAY HESTER, Sheriff, Newport News City Jail; MAJOR MOORE; CAPTAIN BOWER; LIEUTENANT HARRIS; LIEUTENANT WATERHOUSE; DOCTOR RUSSOTTO; DOCTOR ANDERSON; NURSE WILLIAMS,
Defendants - Appellees, and
CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS AND ITS COUNCIL; JANE DOE, Nurse,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-787-2)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick L. Overby, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief
on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint and denying his Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judg-
ment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason-
ing of the district court. Overby v. Hester, No. CA-94-787-2 (E.D.
Va. June 10, 1996 & July 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished