U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Hankins v. Bobby Ross Group Inc

Hankins v. Bobby Ross Group Inc
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 6, 1996

Hankins v. Bobby Ross Group Inc

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7202

RICKY LEE HANKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE BOBBY ROSS GROUP, INCORPORATED; LESTER H.

BEARD, Senior Warden; CHARLES K. HARDY, Assis- tant Warden; DOCTOR BEDWELL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-96-357) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Lee Hankins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Hankins v. Bobby Ross Group, Inc., No. CA-96-357 (E.D. Va. July 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.