Yarborough v. Nord
Yarborough v. Nord
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6827
DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. NORD; C. S. MASSEY; WILLIAM JENNETT; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHERROD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COTTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-343-5-BR)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint seeking equitable relief.
While it is unclear whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act,
Pub. L. No. 104-124, 110Stat. 1321 (1996), was properly applied to
Appellant's complaint, we conclude that the order may be affirmed because Appellant has subsequently been released from incarcer-
ation, rendering his claims moot because he is no longer subjected
to the conditions of which he complained. Magee v. Waters,
810 F.2d 451, 452(4th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished