Smith v. Johnson-Curl
Smith v. Johnson-Curl
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7100
NANCY JANE SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JACQUELINE JOHNSON-CURL, Dr., D.D.S.; C. JAMES HARLAND, Dr., D.O.C., Chief Dentist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-968-3)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nancy Jane Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Morris Holleran, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying
relief on her
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magis-
trate judge. Smith v. Johnson-Curl, No. CA-95-968-3 (E.D. Va. June 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge under
28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (1994).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished