McDaniels v. Starcher
McDaniels v. Starcher
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6870
CLINTON MCDANIELS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY V. STARCHER, and any other Judge having the power to sign an order dismissing the Nobles Case No. 83-C-349,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-31-2)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton McDaniels, Appellant Pro Se. Mario Joseph Palumbo, Attor- ney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant, a West Virginia inmate, appeals the district
court's order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) com-
plaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litiga- tion Reform Act,
Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110Stat. 1321 (1996). We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. McDaniels v. Starcher,
No. CA-96-31-2 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished