United States v. Rogers
United States v. Rogers
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6386
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RUTHERFORD RONALD ROGERS, a/k/a Ronald Lee Saname, a/k/a Ronald Jackson, a/k/a Rodney Walker, a/k/a Theodore Ronald Willis, a/k/a Sylvester Ronald Lewis, a/k/a John Mendenhall, Jr.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-70-K, CA-95-1133-K)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rutherford Ronald Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), amended by Antiter- rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-
132,
110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rogers, Nos. CR-88-70-K; CA-95-1133-K (D. Md. Feb. 29, 1996). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished