Patterson v. Ruby
Patterson v. Ruby
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2231
WAYNE E. PATTERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IRMA JOYCE RUBY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-209-2)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne E. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Irma Joyce Ruby, Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's
recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished