Hicks v. Prince Graves Homes
Hicks v. Prince Graves Homes
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1908
JOY HICKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PRINCE GRAVES HOMES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-96-321)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joy Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order summarily dis-
missing the complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and
the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the district court. Hicks v. Prince Graves Homes, No. CA-96-321 (M.D.N.C. June 13, 1996). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished