U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Moore v. Dodson

Moore v. Dodson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 2, 1996

Moore v. Dodson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7970

MARVIN DAVID MOORE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE P. DODSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA- 95-770-R)

Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 2, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce McCoy Steen, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Charlottes- ville, Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Dodson, No. CA-95-770-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.