Croner v. Metropolitan Life
Croner v. Metropolitan Life
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1152
ROLAND H. CRONER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a Metlife,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1072-5)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 2, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roland H. Croner, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Winfield Turley Shaffer, Michael Thomas Cimino, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia; Daniel J. Doebele, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, New York, New York, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary
judgment for the Appellee in Appellant's action alleging breach of
contract and fraud. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Croner v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Co., No. CA-94-1072-5 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 22, 1996). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although Appellant did not receive the notice required by Roseboro v. Garrison,
528 F.2d 309(4th Cir. 1975), we find the failure to be harmless error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 61.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished