United States v. Rodgers
United States v. Rodgers
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-3187
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM DON RODGERS,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
ONE 1985 CHEVROLET CORVETTE, Vin 1G1YY0780F5125589,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-243-CV-6)
Submitted: December 3, 1996 Decided: December 20, 1996
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Don Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William Don Rodgers appeals from the district court's decision
ordering the civil forfeiture of a 1985 Chevrolet Corvette under
21 U.S.C. § 881(a) (1994). The Government claims the appeal is moot
because it has agreed to dismiss the forfeiture action and release
the property to an innocent lien holder. Rodgers did not respond to the Government's claim, but conceded the lien holder's right to the
vehicle. Accordingly, while we grant Rodgers leave to proceed in
forma pauperis on appeal, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Nakell v. Attorney Gen. of North Carolina,
15 F.3d 319, 322 (4th
Cir. 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished