United States v. Smith
United States v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6822
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
O'DELL SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-93-3, CA-96-7-7-BR)
Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
O'Dell Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Fenita Talore Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), amended by Antiter- rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-
132,
110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-93-3; CA-96-7-7-BR (E.D.N.C. May 13, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion
for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished