U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Babb

United States v. Babb
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 19, 1996

United States v. Babb

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6768

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID A. BABB, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-376, CA-96-958-6-20)

Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Babb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter- rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and Appellant's motion for produc- tion of documents. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Babb, Nos. CR-92-376; CA-96-958-6- (D.S.C. Apr. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.