U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Childress v. Ervine

Childress v. Ervine
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 19, 1996

Childress v. Ervine

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7218

LITTLE TOM CHILDRESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. ERVINE; CALVIN GREGORY; D. MASTERSON; OFFI- CER FERGUSON; OFFICER ASSENAT, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-7219

LITTLE TOM CHILDRESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. ERVINE; RAYMON MORROW, a/k/a Morrison; ROANOKE CITY JAIL, Sheriff's Department, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-575-R, CA-95-184-R)

Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Little Tom Childress, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Rider, RIDER, THOMAS, CLEAVELAND, FERRIS & EAKIN, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's entry of judgment by jury denying relief on his consolidated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaints. We have considered the issues Appellant raised in his informal brief, reviewed the record and the district court's judg- ment, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief under § 1983. Because there are no complex or substantial issues presented in these appeals, we deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.