Sykes v. Davenport
Sykes v. Davenport
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1324
SARAH ANNE SYKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOUIS DAVENPORT, A Law Enforcement Officer with the Town of Bladenboro, NC, in his individual capacity,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-95-136)
Submitted: November 26, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Odum Richardson, Richard Brooks Glazier, BEAVER, HOLT, RICHARDSON, STERNLICHT, BURGE & GLAZIER, P.A., Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Louis Davenport, Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
her
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sykes v. Davenport, No. CA-95-136 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 29, 1996). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished