Harris v. NC Attorney General

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Harris v. NC Attorney General

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6654

JAMES MCCOY HARRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; TOM C. MARTIN,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magis- trate Judge. (CA-95-759-1)

Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James McCoy Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying

relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110

Stat. 1214.* We have reviewed the record and the

magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the

extent a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such

certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magis- trate judge. Harris v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-95- 759-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 1996). We also deny Appellant's motion to

proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

* The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(c) (1994).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished