Green v. Midland Mortgage
Green v. Midland Mortgage
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-3152
In Re: CORLIA NAOMI GREEN, Debtor. _________________________
CORLIA NAOMI GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, and
JAMES GREEN, JR., Plaintiff, versus
MIDLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee, and
THOMAS L. LACKEY, Party in Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-3524-AW, BK-95-1-1082-DK)
Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corlia Naomi Green, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Joseph DiPaula, COVAHEY & BOOZER, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying as un- timely her motion for leave to appeal from an order of the bank- ruptcy court granting relief from an automatic stay. Finding no reversible error, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Green v. Midland Mortgage Co., Nos. CA-95-3524-AW; BK-95-1-1082-DK (D. Md. Dec. 1, 1995). We deny Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal and we deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.