United States v. Blackwell
United States v. Blackwell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6565
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CORNELL BLACKWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-62-P, CA-96-68-3-P)
Submitted: November 26, 1996 Decided: December 17, 1996
Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornell Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-
tion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Blackwell, Nos.
CR-92-62-P; CA-96-68-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 1996). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished