Ford-Bey v. Fry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ford-Bey v. Fry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7030

ANGELO LEWIS FORD-BEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR FRY, Medical Physician; MRS. HANCOCK; NURSE HARVALL; MRS. MOON; MRS. HOGGIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-474-3)

Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 17, 1996

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo Lewis Ford-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from a magistrate judge's order entered for

payment of fees pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act* and the district court's order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both

orders on the reasoning of the district court. Ford-Bey v. Fry, No.

CA-96-474-3 (E.D. Va. June 12 and 28, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We deny Appellant's motion for summary

judgment.

AFFIRMED

*

Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110

Stat. 1321 (1996).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished