U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Minor v. Horsey

Minor v. Horsey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 31, 1996

Minor v. Horsey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2508

FRANKLIN LEE MINOR, SR.; MARY LOU CARPENTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ROBERT D. HORSEY, Judge; SPIRO BUAS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 96-2870-S)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin Lee Minor, Mary Lou Carpenter, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing their petition for writ of mandamus as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Minor v. Horsey, No. CA-96-2870-S (D. Md. Sept. 25, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.