U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

McCray v. Townly

McCray v. Townly
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 31, 1996

McCray v. Townly

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6767

CURTIS JEROME MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM TOWNLY, Superintendent; VIRGINIA DEPART- MENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-940-R)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Jerome McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Townly, No. CA-95-940-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1996). We deny Appel- lant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.