Wright v. Mass Transit Admin
Wright v. Mass Transit Admin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2274
JAMES E. WRIGHT, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MASS TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION; WILLIAM F. COLLINS; EARLINE WARD; HASSELINE CROWDER; DEBRA CROSBY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 99-AMD)
Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James E. Wright, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen J. Masterton, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the
magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss his employment dis-
crimination action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (1994). We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Mass Transit Admin., No. CA-96-99-AMD (D. Md. Aug. 1, 1996). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished