United States v. Attar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Attar

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8519

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AMIR JAMES ATTAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 96-6097

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AMIR JAMES ATTAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge; W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-92-88, CA-95- 548-5) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amir James Attar, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

In Appeal No. 95-8519, Appellant appeals from the district

court's orders denying his motion for release on bail and denying

his motion for reconsideration. Appeal No. 96-6097 is Appellant's

appeal from the district court's order denying his motion filed

under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effec- tive Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110

Stat.

1214. We have reviewed the records in these appeals and the dis-

trict court's opinions and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for

release pending appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Attar, Nos. CR-92-88; CA-95-548-5 (E.D.N.C.

Oct. 13, 1995; Oct. 27, 1995; & Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished