U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Bridgeman v. Beardsley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 9, 1997

105 F.3d 646; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4431; 1997 WL 6927 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

105 F.3d 646

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William C. BRIDGEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ralph S. BEARDSLEY, Warden; Sergeant Pritcherd; Thomas
Smith; Michael Moore; William Catoe; George
Martin; Sergeant Roach; Sergeant
Brown, Defendants-Appellees,
and
John DOE, Lieutenant; Lieutenant Lane, Defendants,
v.
David John LEWIS, Movant.

No. 96-7363.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 10, 1996.
Decided Jan. 9, 1997.

William C. Bridgeman, Appellant Pro Se.

Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bridgeman v. Beardsley, No. CA-95-1998-2-3AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.