U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Alok Kumar v. Robert E. Cahill

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 16, 1997

106 F.3d 390; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26755; 1997 WL 14056 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

106 F.3d 390

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Alok KUMAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert E. CAHILL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-2375.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 9, 1997.
Decided: Jan. 16, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96-2435-L)

Alok Kumar, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Alok Kumar appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kumar v. Cahill, No. CA-96-2435-L (D.Md. Aug. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.