Lantz H. Little v. Department of the Navy, Charleston Naval Shipyard/agency
Lantz H. Little v. Department of the Navy, Charleston Naval Shipyard/agency
Opinion
106 F.3d 390
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lantz H. LITTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Charleston Naval Shipyard/Agency,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-1252.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 9, 1997.
Decided Jan. 16, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-95-2144-2-18)
Lantz H. Little, Appellant Pro Se.
Margaret Beane Seymour, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint against the Department of the Navy. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Little v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-95-2144-2-18 (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.