U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Nathaniel Jones v. Ronald J. Angelone

Nathaniel Jones v. Ronald J. Angelone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 31, 1997
106 F.3d 390; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26730; 1997 WL 36909 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Nathaniel Jones v. Ronald J. Angelone

Opinion

106 F.3d 390

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nathaniel JONES, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ronald J. ANGELONE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-6352.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 23, 1997.
Decided Jan. 31, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-95-793-AM)

Nathaniel Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Angelone, No. CA-95-793-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.