William Anthony Booth v. Rick Loflin, Detective Sergeant A. Spanos, Doctor
William Anthony Booth v. Rick Loflin, Detective Sergeant A. Spanos, Doctor
Opinion
108 F.3d 1371
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Anthony BOOTH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Rick LOFLIN, Detective Sergeant; A. Spanos, Doctor,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 96-7700.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 27, 1997
Decided March 13, 1997.
William Anthony Booth, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; William Howard Moss, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Booth v. Loflin, No. CA-95-135-3 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.