Ernest Brown v. Michael Moore Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Charles Molony Condon
Ernest Brown v. Michael Moore Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Charles Molony Condon
Opinion
108 F.3d 1371
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ernest BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael MOORE; Attorney General of the State of South
Carolina, Charles Molony Condon, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-7013.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 13, 1997.
Decided March 18, 1997.
Ernest Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ernest Brown seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Moore, No. CA-95-2215-0-19BD (D.S.C. June 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.