William H. Scott, III v. Brian K. Miller, Attorney at Law
William H. Scott, III v. Brian K. Miller, Attorney at Law
Opinion
108 F.3d 1373
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William H. SCOTT, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Brian K. MILLER, Attorney at Law, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-7282.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 27, 1997.
Decided March 11, 1997.
William H. Scott, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. Miller, No. CA-96-742 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.