Franklin S. Pacheco v. Sears Roebuck and Company
Franklin S. Pacheco v. Sears Roebuck and Company
Opinion
108 F.3d 1373
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Franklin S. PACHECO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-1763.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 27, 1997.
Decided March 10, 1997.
Franklin S. Pacheco, Appellant Pro Se.
James Bernard Spears, Jr., Aaron M. Christensen, John D. Cole, HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for Defendant in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pacheco v. Sears Roebuck & Co., No. CA-95-298-3-P (W.D.N.C. May 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.