U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Neil Petrov v. Alliedsignal, Incorporated Alliedsignal Technical Services Corporation

Neil Petrov v. Alliedsignal, Incorporated Alliedsignal Technical Services Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 1997
108 F.3d 1373; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10462; 1997 WL 104579 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Neil Petrov v. Alliedsignal, Incorporated Alliedsignal Technical Services Corporation

Opinion

108 F.3d 1373

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Neil PETROV, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALLIEDSIGNAL, INCORPORATED; AlliedSignal Technical Services
Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-2789.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 27, 1997.
Decided: March 10, 1997.

Neil Petrov, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley Mazaroff, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in this action alleging employment discrimination and failure to pay wages and benefits upon termination. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Petrov v. AlliedSignal, Inc., No. CA-95-3846-DKC (D.Md. Nov. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.