U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Richard Edison Boyd, A/K/A Jake Boyd

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 11, 1997

108 F.3d 1373; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10461; 1997 WL 107423 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

108 F.3d 1373

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard Edison BOYD, a/k/a Jake Boyd, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6803.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 27, 1997.
Decided March 11, 1997.

Richard Edison Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Jefferson McClure Gray, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Boyd, Nos. CR-92-383; CA-95-3774-MJG (D.Md. Apr. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.