United States v. Louis Nomar
United States v. Louis Nomar
Opinion
108 F.3d 1374
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Louis NOMAR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-6415.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 4, 1997.
Decided March 11, 1997.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Louis Nomar, Appellant Pro Se.
Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, WV, for Appellee.
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nomar, No. CR-95-65; CA-95-1140-2 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.