U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Margaret F. Spencer

United States v. Margaret F. Spencer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 1997
108 F.3d 1374; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10139; 1997 WL 104571 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Margaret F. Spencer

Opinion

108 F.3d 1374

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Margaret F. SPENCER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6623.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 27, 1997.
Decided: March 10, 1997.

Margaret F. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. David Glenn Barger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Spencer, Nos. CR-94-75; CA-96-56-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.