U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Tanya Glenn Munoz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 20, 1997

108 F.3d 1374; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10110; 1997 WL 126062 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

108 F.3d 1374

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Tanya Glenn MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-7752.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 13, 1997.
Decided: March 20, 1997.

Tanya Glenn Munoz, Appellant Pro Se.

Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Munoz, Nos. CR-93-146-BR; CA-96-664-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.