United States v. Steadman
United States v. Steadman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6988
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHN WALTER STEADMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-93-122, CA-95-189-3-MU)
Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 3, 1997
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Walter Steadman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), amended by Antiter- rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-
132,
110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. United States v. Steadman, Nos. CR- 93-122; CA-95-189-3-MU (W.D.N.C. June 12, 1996). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished