UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2444

CLYDE A. MILES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. Nos. 87-36499, 88-5234)

Submitted: December 17, 1996 Decided: January 3, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clyde A. Miles, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Richard Farber, Andrea R. Tebbets, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Clyde A. Miles appeals from the tax court's orders (1) entered

September 21, 1992, dismissing his petition in tax court No. 88-

5234 for lack of jurisdiction and (2) entered November 28, 1994,

upholding the Commissioner's assessment of deficiencies and addi-

tions to tax with respect to his federal income tax liability for 1979-1982 (Tax Court No. 87-36499). Our review of the record and

the tax court's order dismissing Miles' petition in No. 88-5234

reveals that the appeal of this decision is without merit. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Miles v. Commissioner, No. 88-5234 (U.S.T.C. Sept. 21, 1992).

Miles' notice of appeal, filed on July 19, 1995, is untimely

as to the tax court's order in No. 87-36499. Section 7483 of the

Internal Revenue Code provides that "[r]eview of a decision of the tax court shall be obtained by filing a notice of appeal with the

Clerk of the Tax Court within 90 days after the decision of the Tax

Court is entered."

(1994); see also Fed. R. App.

P. 13(a). The timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdiction- al. Davies v. Commissioner,

(9th Cir. 1983); Robert Louis Stevenson Apartments, Inc. v. Commissioner,

(8th Cir. 1964); Vibro Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner,

(2d Cir. 1963). Miles' motions to vacate did not extend the

time to appeal the tax court's decision. Although a timely motion

to vacate or revise a decision under Rule 13(a) tolls the time

period for noting an appeal, successive post-decision motions may not be tacked together to perpetuate the prescribed time for

2 appeal. Okon v. Commissioner,

(10th Cir.), cert. denied,

(1994). See Fed. R. App. P. 13(a); Tax

Ct. R. 162. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the tax court's

decision in No. 87-36499 for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART

3