United States v. Custis
United States v. Custis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6978
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DARREN J. CUSTIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR- 91-334-S, CA-96-1352-S)
Submitted: November 12, 1996 Decided: January 9, 1997
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darren J. Custis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Darren J. Custis seeks to appeal the district court's order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Custis, Nos.
CR-91-334-S; CA-96-1352-S (D. Md. May 30, 1996). We deny Custis'
motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished