Reeves v. Stewart
Reeves v. Stewart
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6619
WILLIAM BRITT REEVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
T. R. STEWART; J. E. STRICKLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 96-6620
WILLIAM BRITT REEVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN STACKHOUSE; GEORGE L. JONES,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
HAROLD WILLIAMS,
Defendant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-244-5-H, CA-96-138-5-H)
Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 9, 1997
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Britt Reeves, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2 PER CURIAM:
Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district
court's orders denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) com-
plaints under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Liti- gation Reform Act,
Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110Stat. 1321 (1996). We
have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and
find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Reeves v. Stewart
and Reeves v. Stackhouse, Nos. CA-96-244-5-H; CA-96-138-5-H
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished