United States v. Toliver

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Toliver

Opinion

Filed: January 7, 1997

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6221 (CR-89-391-JFM, CA-95-3272-JFM)

United States of America,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Colbert Toliver,

Defendant - Appellant.

O R D E R

The Court amends its opinion filed October 23, 1996, as

follows: On the cover sheet, section 3, line 3 -- the district court's

number is corrected to read "CR-89- 391-JFM."

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6221

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

COLBERT TOLIVER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-89-391-JFM, CA-95-3272-JFM)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 23, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Colbert Toliver, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Toliver, Nos. CR-89-891- JFM; CA-95-3272-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished