Parker v. Davis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Parker v. Davis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7499

SAMUEL PARKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C. E. DAVIS, Warden; LORETTA HOUSE, L.P.N.; DR. SHELTON; J. G. BRUGES; J. D. NETHERLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-866)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Parker, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attor- ney General, Richmond, Virginia; David Ernest Boelzner, Michael Lawrence Goodman, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's order denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate

judge. Parker v. Davis, No. CA-95-866 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(c) (1994).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished